ICLE Homepage | Other Proposed Amendments to MCRs
                September 24, 2002



2002-22


Proposed Amendment of Rule 3.206
of the Michigan Court Rules
                                                           

          On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering an
amendment of Rule 3.206 of the Michigan Court Rules.  Before determining whether the
proposal should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford 
interested persons the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposal.  The
Court welcomes the views of all who wish to address the proposal or who wish to suggest
alternatives.  The Court specifically invites comment regarding the source of its authority to
provide for attorney fees in domestic relations cases.  See, e.g., MCL 600.2401, 600.2405, and
552.13.  Before adoption or rejection, this proposal will be considered at a public hearing by the
Court.  Notice of future public hearings will be provided by the Court and posted at
www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt.

          Publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on
the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption of the proposal in its present form.

   [The present language would be amended as indicated below.]


ICLE Editor's Note:

[Italicized, bracketed text] indicates text that has been deleted.
Bold text indicates new text.



RULE 3.206     PLEADING

     (A) - (B) [Unchanged.]

     (C)     Attorney fees and expenses

               (1)  A party may, at any time, request that the court order the other
     party to pay all or part of the fees and expenses related to the action or a
     specific proceeding, including a post-judgment proceeding.

               (2)  A party who requests attorney fees and expenses must allege facts
     sufficient to show that:

                 (a)   the party is unable to bear the expense  of the action,
     and the other party is able to pay, or

                              (b)  the attorney fees and expenses were incurred
               because the other party refused to comply with a
               previous court order, despite having the ability to
               comply.


     Staff Comment:  The proposed amendment of MCR 3.206(C) has been
suggested by the Michigan Judges Association to:  (1) reduce the number of hearings that occur
because of a litigant's vindictive or wrongful behavior; (2) shift the costs associated with
wrongful conduct to the party engaging in the improper behavior; (3) remove the ability of a
vindictive litigant to apply financial pressure to the opposing party; (4) create a financial
incentive for attorneys to 
accept a wronged party as a client; and (5) foster respect for court orders.  The Court specifically
is inviting comment regarding the source of its authority to provide for attorney fees in domestic
relations cases.
 
The staff comment is published only for the benefit of the bench and bar and is not an
authoritative construction by the Court.

          A copy of this order will be given to the Secretary of the State Bar and to the State
Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201.  Comments 
on this proposal may be sent to the Supreme Court Clerk in writing or electronically by
January 1, 2003, Clerk's Office, Michigan Supreme Court, P.O. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909,
or MSC_clerk@courts.mi.gov.  When filing a comment, please refer to File No. 2002-22.  Your
comments and those of others will be posted at www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt.