ICLE Homepage | Other New and Amended MCRs
November 25, 1997
97-06
Amendments of Rules 7.213 and 7.302
of the Michigan Court Rules
___________________________________
On order of the Court, notice of proposed changes having
been provided, and consideration having been given to the
comments received in response to that notice, the following
amendments of MCR 7.213 and 7.302 are adopted to be effective
January 1, 1998.
[The present language is amended as indicated below.]
ICLE Editor's Note:
[Italicized, bracketed text] indicates text that has been
deleted.
Bold text indicates new text.
Rule 7.213 Calendar Cases
(A) Pre-Argument Conference in Calendar Cases.
(1) At any time before submission of a case, the Court of
Appeals may direct the attorneys for the parties to
appear in person or by telephone for a pre-argument
conference. The conference will be conducted by the
court, or by a judge, retired judge or attorney
designated by the court, known as a moderator. The
conference shall consider the possibility of
settlement, the simplification of the issues, and any
other matters which the moderator determines may aid in
the handling of or the disposition of the appeal. The
moderator shall make an order that recites the action
taken at the conference and the agreements made by the
parties as to any of the matters considered, and that
limits the issues to those not disposed of by the
admissions or agreements of counsel. Such order, when
entered, controls the subsequent proceedings, unless
modified to prevent manifest injustice.
(2) All civil cases will be examined to determine if a
pre-argument conference would be of assistance to the
court or the parties. An attorney or a party may
request a pre-argument conference in any case. Such
a request shall be confidential. The pre-argument
conference shall be conducted by
(a) the court, or by a judge, retired judge or
attorney designated by the court;
(b) if the parties unanimously agree, a special
moderator designated by the court or selected by
unanimous agreement of the parties. The special
moderator shall be an attorney, licensed in
Michigan, who possesses either mediation-type
experience or expertise in the subject matter of
the case. The special moderator may charge a
reasonable fee, which shall be divided and borne
equally by the parties unless agreed otherwise and
paid by the parties directly to the moderator. If
a party does not agree upon the fee requested by
the moderator, upon motion of the party, the Court
of Appeals shall set a reasonable fee.
When a case has been selected for participation in a
pre-argument conference, participation in the
conference is mandatory; however, the Court of Appeals
may except the case from participation on motion for
good cause shown if it finds that a pre-argument
conference in that case would be inappropriate.
(3) Any judge who participates in a pre-argument conference
or becomes involved in settlement discussions under
this rule may not thereafter consider any aspect of the
merits of the case, except that participation in a
pre-argument conference shall not preclude the judge
from considering the case pursuant to MCR
7.215(H) [Administrative Order 1994-4].
(4) - (6) [Unchanged.]
(B) (E) [Unchanged.]
Rule 7.302 Application for Leave to Appeal
(A) (B) [Unchanged.]
C. When to File
(1) (4) [Unchanged.]
(5) Effect of Appeal on Decision Remanding Case. If a
party appeals a decision which remands for further
proceedings as provided in subrule (C)(4)(a), the
following provisions apply:
(a) If the Court of Appeals decision is a judgment
under MCR 7.215[(E)](D)(1), a timely
appeal stays proceedings on remand unless the
Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court orders
otherwise.
a. If the Court of Appeals decision is an order other than a
judgment under MCR 7.215[(E)](D)(1),
the proceedings on remand are not stayed by an
application for leave to appeal unless so ordered
by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.
(6) [Unchanged.]
(D) (G) [Unchanged.]
STAFF COMMENT: The January 1, 1998 amendment of MCR
7.213 modifies the procedure for pre-argument conferences in
the Court of Appeals. Ordinarily, the conference will be
conducted by a judge or attorney selected by the Court of
Appeals. However, the parties may agree to an alternative
procedure using a special moderator.
In addition, MCR 7.302(C)(5) is amended to correct
cross-references to MCR 7.215.
The staff comment is published only for the benefit of the
bench and bar and is not an authoritative construction by
the Court.